Members, please login. Not a member? Create a login & Join us! Membership is free & gives you access to book giveaways, author chats & your private, free book club page.
Longtime defense attorney Mickey Haller is recruited to change stripes and prosecute the high-profile retrial of a brutal child murder. After 24 years in prison, convicted killer Jason Jessup has been exonerated by new DNA evidence. Haller is convinced Jessup is guilty, and he takes the ...
(Longtime defense attorney Mickey Haller is recruited to change stripes and prosecute the high-profile retrial of a brutal child murder. After 24 years in prison, convicted killer Jason Jessup has been exonerated by new DNA evidence. Haller is convinced Jessup is guilty, and he takes the case on the condition that he gets to choose his investigator, LAPD Detective Harry Bosch.
Together, Bosch and Haller set off on a case fraught with political and personal danger. Opposing them is Jessup, now out on bail, a defense attorney who excels at manipulating the media, and a runaway eyewitness reluctant to testify after so many years.
With the odds and the evidence against them, Bosch and Haller must nail a sadistic killer once and for all. If Bosch is sure of anything, it is that Jason Jessup plans to kill again.
1. Do you think Mickey enjoyed his first experience as a prosecutor? Could you see him dealing with a boss and surviving in the bureaucracy of the DA's office on a regular basis? What did you think were his motives for taking on this case?
2. Harry Bosch said his daughter, Maddie Bosch, was in therapy dealing with her mother's death and he thought it was helping her. Harry seemed to be focusing on his daughter's well-being, and putting his own needs aside, for the time being. Will that wo
3. How do you think Maggie and Mickey did working together for the first time? Do you think working together helped or damaged a possible reconciliation between them?
The Reversal was a quick read that leads the reader on a venture in search of justice. The questions at hand are “is there evidence to support the originally conviction and is the evidence strong enough... (read more)
