Member Profile
Name : | Peggy J. |
My Reviews
We read this book for "Virginia Reads" in September of 2008. Many of our members had already read the book or at least seen the movie many years ago. There was much controversy as to whether it was a good slection before we met. In the end, everybody was glad we took the time to read this book (for some again). The story takes on hot issues from the past of racism in the south with a white girl wrongly accusing a black man of rape. The story is seen through the eyes of the children of the man who accepts the case as the defendant's lawyer in a time when no white man would touch such a case. Harper Lee does an amazing job of portraing the incedent from many different points of view. Members of our group were disappointed and frankly shocked that Harper Lee never went on to write anymore books.
Most of our group agreed this book was worth reading but not everyone liked the book. It has some techniques that are interesting but at the same time annoying such as Russo's use of bouncing back and forth in time. Also one character has a name change part way through the book which gets a little confusing sometimes. The book deals with many social issues that allow for much lively discussion.
Although I didn't enjoy this title as much as I remembered I still found it insightful especially when you consider it was written in 1932. It is about a utopian world where everybody belongs to everybody, sex and drugs keep emotions in check and nobody is unhappy with their lot in life. Except, of course, the rejected culture that is left to fend for themselves. I think it's meant to shock us into realizing there can never really be a utopia because people are too complex.We had an interesting discussion but it was not a big hit with the group overall.
Overall the bookclub didn't care that much for this selection. It doesn't offer all that much to talk about and many felt it was a bit far-fetched. Although Mr. Patterson wrote in the prologue about the necessity of people to share their life's stories, most of the group didn't feel that many grandmothers would share stories about how they felt toward the grandfather to a grandchild nor would she talk about having an affair. They sort of felt it was a bit pointless.
I like Agatha Christie. She is a great author but this isn't a great book for a book group simply because there isn't that much to talk about unless you've read many or most of her books. Most of us had not read more than one which sort of limited what all we could discuss.
This book deals not only with what it was like to be black and a maid in the 60s in Mississippi, but with the courage of one white woman and many black maids who tell their story against life-threatening odds in times of racial termoil in the south.It's tender, sensitive, heartbreaking, humerous and infuriating all rolled up into one.It's a very powerful book that everyone should read!
I liked this book more that the rest of the group. They found it rather pointless as whole. I think if Sara would have concentrated more on the apes we would have enjoyed it more. It seemed that the character development was weak at best. It had potential to be quite interesting but left us unsatisfied.
If you loved the Hunger Games, you have to enjoy this book and it’s the first in a trilogy as I understand it. I even read that Ridley Scott already purchased the rights to a movie to be release in 2014.
Here’s my short synopsis: Dystopian, post- apocalyptic, strong female characters, totally messed up people that want to sacrifice a boy child, the coolest companion ever, a crow, horrible grammar that seemed to fit perfectly to me…good fighting evil, of course, giant worms with claws, an evil boy king…a heroine with anger management issues…did I leave anything out? This should make a thrilling movie!
I found this book interesting. It takes a while to understand how the different characters have any connection. What I liked about it best, once I began to understand what was going on, was how I really still had no idea what would come next. I thought it might be fairly predictable but it was anything but. The people,although not terribly likeable, are interesting. If you want a read that keeps you guessing...this might be the one for you.
This book was written a long time ago (published in 1814) which made it interesting to us for that alone. There were a lot of characters. The writing and/or language of the time was pretty formal. It was somewhat difficult to keep the characters straight. We found plenty of things to discuss and it is a classic, but it wasn't our favorite read.
Book Club HQ to over 88,000+ book clubs and ready to welcome yours.
Get free weekly updates on top club picks, book giveaways, author events and more